
How
Will They Survive?:
Record Store Owners on the Threat of New
Technology
By Art Howard
Published circa April 22, 2005
The name Shawn Fanning is
not as well-known as Steve Jobs or Bill
Gates, but in the annals of Internet
folklore it possibly looms larger. In
1999 Fanning was an 18-year old employee
at his uncle's struggling online gaming
company. Legend has it that in one
60-hour sprint he wrote the code for what
became Napster, a file-sharing computer
network that spawned lawsuits from the
Recording Industry Association of
America, metal band Metallica and hip
hopper Dr. Dre. It also ignited a new
media revolution.
The idea was that instead of downloading
files, primarily mp3 music files, from a
single server, Internet chat pager
technology could be used to find out when
two users were online, allow them to
search each other's hard drives and
download content from each other for
free. Copyrighted recordings began flying
dorm room-to-dorm room faster than you
could say DSL and Napster was quickly in
legal hot water.
The legal wrangles brought down the
original Napster but there are legions of
imitators opening and closing all the
time. And as late as February the RIAA
announced new lawsuits against 753 file
sharers.
If file sharing threatens the music
industry at large surely it means death
for that small, independent record
retailer around the corner, right? Well,
maybe not says Eric Levin, owner of
Little Five Points' Criminal Records,
"When I was a kid I would go over to
my friend's house and trade and tape each
other's records. That's the Internet.
It's just easier."
Harry DeMille, proprietor of Wax n'
Facts, also in Little Five Points, says
the record industry may be ruing a loss
it has never suffered, "It probably
cut into the sales of newer, trendier
stuff somewhat. But you can't just
presume those sales would be happening,
anyway. Maybe the industry is selling
fewer units because the music is not as
good? Has anyone ever posited that
notion?"
One person positing that notion is
Douglas Rushkoff, documentarian, lecturer
and author of several books on new media
and cyber culture. Says Rushkoff,
"Mega media companies bought music
companies because of the spike in CD
sales shortly after they were invented.
They didn't look at the components of the
spike, however, and realize it was just
baby boomers buying CD versions of their
favorite records. By the time the
industry was owned by the conglomerates
the spike was over, and new business
practices were in place that didn't allow
for the development of new artists or the
distribution of smaller ones. Meanwhile,
people started getting files by (sharing)
because they hated an industry that
charged more for CDs which cost less to
make than records."
"I don't care if I look in a kid's
car and he's got 10 burned CDs floating
around, because he's also got two or
three things he bought," Criminal
Records' Levin says, "and maybe he's
got the vinyl album or a magazine."
At the same time he tsk-tsks what he
considers theft. "I just can't
imagine that you could be a fan of
something and a thief at the same
time."
Criminal Records has embraced the
Internet insofar as it has a Web site,
which Levin says he considers as
necessary as a business card. Wax n'
Facts does not have a site, however,
Harry DeMille says because, "I feel
like I owe Atlanta a lot and certainly I
owe my regular customers. Putting stuff
online without giving them first dibs on
it just seems discourteous." Though
a proponent of cyber culture Rushkoff
believes small stores are here to stay,
"I don't believe that live
interaction is a thing of the past. I
think that the disappearance of such
institutions has made music buying less
fun. If people want a culture around
music collecting they'll need places to
do this. The mom-and-pop store has been
replaced by the DJ store - a kind of
record store where people go and listen
to music and talk to one another. These
stores are thriving, indeed."
"Ever since the advent of the
Internet and downloading free music
people have been saying it's the end of
the music industry. Well we're still here
and in fact we're doing better than
ever," Levin says.
"If you can't have a successful
operation in a city closing in on 5
million people maybe you're doing
something wrong," DeMille opines.
|